Environmental groups call for more rigor in forestry

Widespread damage caused by slash during last year’s Tolaga Bay floods has led to a call by environment groups to change the way the forestry industry operates.

The Environmental Defence Society (EDS) and Forest and Bird have released an analysis of the current regulations governing plantation forestry in New Zealand. The analysis calls for a fundamental reset of the rules to better protect the environment.

The report, A Review of the Resource Management National Environmental Standards for Plantation Forestry Regulations 2017, was published this week and is designed to provide input into the Government’s own review of the National Environmental Standard for Plantation Forestry 2017 (NES-PF) which is under way, led by the Ministry for Primary Industries.

“EDS and Forest and Bird decided to jointly prepare this report because of increasing public concern about the impacts of commercial forestry in light of events like the Tolaga Bay devastation,” co-author Sally Gepp said.

“The concerns focused on the sense that the current regulatory approach was a light touch which was inappropriate for such a high-risk sector.

“The industry is high risk in terms of worker safety but also environmental impacts especially from slash and sediment.

“We make three key observations in our report.

“First, the NESPF’s approach to afforestation and replanting is too permissive and needs to be re-examined.

“Greater stringency needs to be applied. This is especially the case if we are to plant a billion trees.

“Secondly, the NESPF’s presumption that plantation forestry activities should be a permitted activity needs to be revisited.

“This is fundamental if we are to ensure appropriate oversight of the sector

“Thirdly, in most instances, the adverse environmental impacts of clear-fell harvesting are significant. Therefore policy needs to be developed to facilitate a transition to more sustainable methods. Slash and sediment must be better controlled and that may require staged harvesting rather than present methods.

Forest and Bird and EDS welcomed “ongoing engagement” with stakeholders on the report.

The floods, which happened just six days after an earlier event, directly affected 20 homes around the Tolaga Bay, Whangara and Waimata areas, as well as in Te Karaka and Ormond.

The event, categorised as a “Medium Scale Adverse Event” by the Ministry for Primary Industries, also left paddocks covered with sediment, woody debris and logs, and resulted in insurers paying out $4m in claims.

Widespread damage caused by slash during last year’s Tolaga Bay floods has led to a call by environment groups to change the way the forestry industry operates.

The Environmental Defence Society (EDS) and Forest and Bird have released an analysis of the current regulations governing plantation forestry in New Zealand. The analysis calls for a fundamental reset of the rules to better protect the environment.

The report, A Review of the Resource Management National Environmental Standards for Plantation Forestry Regulations 2017, was published this week and is designed to provide input into the Government’s own review of the National Environmental Standard for Plantation Forestry 2017 (NES-PF) which is under way, led by the Ministry for Primary Industries.

“EDS and Forest and Bird decided to jointly prepare this report because of increasing public concern about the impacts of commercial forestry in light of events like the Tolaga Bay devastation,” co-author Sally Gepp said.

“The concerns focused on the sense that the current regulatory approach was a light touch which was inappropriate for such a high-risk sector.

“The industry is high risk in terms of worker safety but also environmental impacts especially from slash and sediment.

“We make three key observations in our report.

“First, the NESPF’s approach to afforestation and replanting is too permissive and needs to be re-examined.

“Greater stringency needs to be applied. This is especially the case if we are to plant a billion trees.

“Secondly, the NESPF’s presumption that plantation forestry activities should be a permitted activity needs to be revisited.

“This is fundamental if we are to ensure appropriate oversight of the sector

“Thirdly, in most instances, the adverse environmental impacts of clear-fell harvesting are significant. Therefore policy needs to be developed to facilitate a transition to more sustainable methods. Slash and sediment must be better controlled and that may require staged harvesting rather than present methods.

Forest and Bird and EDS welcomed “ongoing engagement” with stakeholders on the report.

The floods, which happened just six days after an earlier event, directly affected 20 homes around the Tolaga Bay, Whangara and Waimata areas, as well as in Te Karaka and Ormond.

The event, categorised as a “Medium Scale Adverse Event” by the Ministry for Primary Industries, also left paddocks covered with sediment, woody debris and logs, and resulted in insurers paying out $4m in claims.

Your email address will not be published. Comments will display after being approved by a staff member. Comments may be edited for clarity.

Poll

  • Voting please wait...
    Your vote has been cast. Reloading page...
    Do you think more or less of Jacinda Ardern after the Prime Minister ruled out a capital gains tax under her leadership?