c8d551aa4b3e8d37b4b36b47f6a77d96
Subscribe today
© 2024 The Gisborne Herald

New rules target erosion risk: GDC plans signal major shift in land management

3 min read

Gisborne land adaptation shifts have received positive feedback from both the Eastland Wood Council and an environmental group. 

The region’s farmers and forestry companies might end up with designated land they can’t operate on under new council plans. 

Council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said they were looking at more accurate identification and management of erosion risks across Tairāwhiti. 

“Overlay 3B” is coined in council reports as “the worst eroding land across the region”. 

Through identification, Gisborne District Council aims to “landmark” these areas, mandating some pastoral farming and forestry owners to transition their land into permanent vegetation cover. 

A council report says the land use changes “crystalised in the wake of cyclones Hale and Gabrielle in early 2023”. 

Overlay 3B is an extension of the current land overlay framework in the Tairāwhiti Resource Management Plan (TRMP). 

Gisborne District Council (GDC) requested Manaaki Whenua — Landcare Research to help identify which areas in the region have a high likelihood of landslides, and whether these landslides will affect waterways. 

According to a council report, the map was completed in March 2024. 

“The model utilises advanced technology and builds on previous regional research,” Thatcher Swann said in a statement. 

“It analyses where landslides occur and their potential to impact waterways, drawing on data collected across the region.” 

Eastland Wood Council (EWC) chief executive Philip Hope said they received the database just over a week ago and were still working through what it meant for EWC members. 

“At an initial glance, we believe it is a marked improvement on previously available mapping for Tairāwhiti. 

“Our industry is working through meetings with Gisborne District Council to better understand the information, including how it was developed.” 

It would take time to understand the data and talk to their members to form views on this model, Hope said. “We expect it will have significant implications on how all land is managed in the future and think it could be a useful tool as our district works towards increasingly sustainable land use, such as retirement, rehabilitation and conversion – and where appropriate, the status quo.” 

EWC would continue to work with the council, iwi and mana whenua on sustainable land use and planning in Tairāwhiti, he said. 

Mana Taiao Tairāwhiti (MTT), a Gisborne group that organised a petition calling for land-use rule changes, said it was pleased the new landslide susceptibility and connectivity map had been released. 

“It is great to see the maps compiled by scientists who know this region intimately and have used the latest tools to classify the risk in every square metre of Tairāwhiti,” co-founder Tui Warmenhoven said. 

“Now we can have a robust science-informed debate about what, if any, commercial activities are consistent with the wellbeing of the land, waterways and coastal marine areas.” MTT said it was also encouraged to hear that the council would investigate the economic, social, cultural and environmental impacts of the rule changes. 

“It is really important to understand who and what will be affected by these changes — both positive and negative impacts for everyone, from specific streams and rivers to residents, ratepayers, farmers and the overseas owners of pine plantations,” MTT spokesman Manu Caddie said. 

Local Democracy Reporting approached Federated Farmers for comment but the federation was unable to provide it at the time of the request. 

The council will work with tangata whenua, landowners and communities before confirming which land falls into Overlay 3B and will propose options for land management in these areas, according to a council statement. 


3 comments

commenter avatar
Simin Williams
0
6 July 2024
Identifying lands which are not suitable for forestry is one thing, encroaching onto the private property rights of our farmers is entirely another thing.
While council needs to get its science right and make sure only suitable land is used/licensed for forestry, so that slash doesn’t end up in our waterways, beaches, farms and people’s backyards, it has no right to increase its overreach into farmers' private properties.
Eastland Wood Council and all forest owners are acutely aware that the status quo cannot continue and have already expressed their own desire to make sure forestry happens only in the right places.

On the other hand, Council has no right whatsoever to encroach on private properties, unless we have unknowingly become the NZ Communist party overnight with Comrade Nedine Thatcher Swann as our leader?!
As to Mana Taiao Tairāwhiti (MTT) supporting Ms.Thatcher Swann’s plans and declaring itself an environmental group, I do not know any group more dedicated to the environment than our farmers. They are the best judges of what they do on their land, because it affects them and their animals.
I would like to know, since its inception, how much MTT has received from GDC directly or through various central government funds. I would like to see a report and audit of how these funds were spent. While we are at it, what happened to the $400,000 received from central government in Aug 2022 as part of the 3-Waters "lolly scramble" package? It was designated as “to help communities understand and plan for the future impacts of climate change”. Who received this and what was it spent on? Can we see an audit on it please? I have asked several councillors about this and I haven’t received a reply yet.
Calling yourself an environmental group because you support 1080, is a far cry from farmers using traps or shooting to reduce pest numbers, planting trees on their lands and keeping their waterways clean. The catchment groups run by farmers do awesome work here in Tairāwhiti and they are the ones worthy of Govt funds.
I suggest our farmers contact their representative in Parliament straight away to protect their private property rights before comrades in the GDC become too enthusiastic about self-proclaimed rights over private properties. All residents need to be concerned about this, as comrades might start with farms but it won’t end there. Under the guise of climate change activism, they have their eyes on all private properties.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Read and post comments with a
Newsroom Pro subscription.

Subscribe now to start a free
28-day trial.

SUBSCRIBE TO PRO
View our subscription options